WebHAZEN PAPER CO. et al. v. BIGGINS certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the first circuit No. 91–1600. Argued January 13, 1993—Decided April 20, 1993 Petitioners … WebBiggins developed a superior water- that increased the company's sales. He sought a larger salary, was given a small increase, remained unsatisfied and sought a further …
{{meta.fullTitle}} - {{meta.siteName}}
Web19 de jul. de 1996 · See Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604, 113 S.Ct. 1701, 123 L.Ed.2d 338 (1993). On October 18, 1993, a panel of the First Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion, ... Including interest, plaintiff has been paid over $600,000 already on the original ERISA judgment. His success at the first trial, ... WebHazen Paper is a world-class paper converter specializing in custom holographic originations, film, foil, and paper laminations, specialty and gravure coatings, and rotary … flix brewery des moines
HAZEN PAPER COMPANY, et al., Petitioners, v. Walter F. BIGGINS.
Web13 de jan. de 1993 · * Petitioner Hazen Paper Company manufactures coated, laminated, and printed paper and paperboard. The company is owned and operated by two cousins, petitioners Robert Hazen and Thomas N. Hazen. The Hazens hired respondent Walter F. Biggins as their technical director in 1977. They fired him in 1986, when he was 62 … Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a disparate treatment claim cannot succeed unless the employee's protected trait had a determinative influence on the employer's decisionmaking. Ver mais Hazen Paper fired Biggins, 62, a few weeks before his service would have reached the required number of years for his pension to vest. Biggins sued Hazen Paper alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 Ver mais • List of United States Supreme Court cases • Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume Ver mais • Text of Withrow v. Williams, 507 U.S. 604 (1993) is available from: Findlaw Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio) Ver mais WebBiggins brought suit against Hazen Paper Company in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and alleged in part that his firing violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) ( 29 USCS 621 et seq.) because his age had been a determinative factor in the company's decision to fire him. great gatsby theme font